Challenges in the Management of Chemotherapy Related Anemia

Review Article

Ann Hematol Oncol. 2018; 5(3): 1200.

Challenges in the Management of Chemotherapy Related Anemia

Visweshwar N1*, Jaglal M2 and Sokol L2

1Division of Hematology, University of South Florida, USA

2Division of Medical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, USA

*Corresponding author: Visweshwar N, Department of Hematology, University of South Florida, Tampa FL 33612, USA

Received: March 16, 2018; Accepted: April 30, 2018; Published: May 21, 2018

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced anemia (CRA) was reported with methotrexate, when it was used in early 50sto treat cancer, and cure patients with choriocarcinoma. Subsequently, CRA has been observed with other chemotherapeutic agents. Patients with CRA have local tumor control from hypoxia and subsequent resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy with decreased overall survival. Therefore, CRA requires appropriate intervention. However, there are difficulties in diagnosis and management of CRA, because of the multifactorial etiology of anemia in cancer patients. In spite of several randomized controlled clinical trials and systematic reviews, there is still lack of standardized approach to the management of CRA. We will review the pathophysiology of CRA especially the role of Hepcidin, and discuss algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of CRA. The purpose of this article is to help the clinician stratify the management based on review of available evidence, which may change as future data emerges.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; Anemia; Iron; Erythropoietin; Blood transfusion; Therapy

Pathophysiology of CRA

Chemotherapy-related anemia occurs in about 75% (30%-90%) of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy [1,2]. There is direct inhibition of erythropoiesis by cytokines (interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor a, interferon gamma and interleukin-1). Interleukin-6 increases production of hepcidin by liver, causing CRA (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Role of Hepcidin in CRA.

    

    
    

    

    Figure 1:  Role of Hepcidin in CRA.

Hepcidin is incriminated in the pathogenesis, and may soon find its place as a promising tool in the diagnosis and management of iron deficiency and CRA [3-5]. Hepcidin maintains iron homeostasis [6]. It is a25-amino acid peptide produced by the liver secondary to an inflammatory state. Hepcidin is produced by hepcidin anti-microbial peptic gene (HAMP) in chromosome 19 [7]. Over expression of this gene is seen with hematological and non-hematological cancers secondary to release of interleukin-6 [8]. Hepcidin inhibits the release of iron from macrophages in bone marrow by suppressing ferroportin Figure 1. Ferroportinhelps transfer of iron from gastric mucosa to transferrin, the biological iron transporter of blood [8]. Functional deficiency of iron results from release of cytokines resulting in increased production of hepcidin from the liver. Elevated level of hepcidin is seen in solid tumors including prostate, kidney, brain, lung, breast, liver and ovarian cancers [9-12]. Hepcidin levels are also increased in Hodgkin’s lymphoma, non- Hodgkin’s lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic/myeloblastic leukemia and myeloma [7,13,14]. However, in hematological malignancies, an interleukin -6independent mechanism, mediated by increased bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-2), a regulator of hepcidin transcription is also described [7]. Hepcidin expression is suppressed in liver when there is infiltration by the tumor [7].

Clinical Features and Assessment of Patients with CRA

The initial workup should include a detailed history. The

common symptoms include: effort dyspnea, syncope, headache, vertigo, chest pain, fatigue interrupting activities of daily living, and history of blood loss from gastrointestinal/genitourinary tract. Patients need focused physical examination for evidence of infection from central line, chest or urinary tract. Hematinic work up must include serum iron, iron binding capacity, ferritin, serum B12, red cell folate, evidence of hemolysis including reticulocyte count, LDH, haptoglobin, assessment of renal and liver function tests, coagulation profile to exclude acute or chronic DIC, ultrasound abdomen for splenomegaly and blood smear for evidence of toxic changes (vacuoles, hyper- granulation) of polymorphs, leukoerythroblastic blood picture, fragmentation of RBCs or other evidence of hemolysis.

Difficulties Encountered in Management of CRA

It was traditionally felt that for CRA, no specific intervention, including blood transfusion, is needed unless hemoglobin concentrations declined to a low level (‹7 g/dL) or the patient developed symptoms of shortness of breath, chest pain or palpitation (Table 1) [15]. The anemia that did not reach the transfusion trigger was considered unimportant.

Table 1: Grading the severity of CRA.





  

    
Severity

    
WHO

    
NCI

  

  

    
Grade 0 (WNL)

    
>11.0 g/dL

    
14.0-18.0 g/dL for men12.0-16.0    g/dL for women

  

  

    
Grade 1 (mild)

    
9.5-10.9 g/dL

    
>10.0 g/dL

  

  

    
Grade 2 (moderate)

    
8.0-9.4 g/dL

    
8.0-10.0 g/dL

  

  

    
Grade 3 (serious)

    
6.5-7.9 g/dL

    
6.5-7.9 g/dL

  

  

    
Grade 4 (life threatening)

    
<6.5 g/dL

    
<6.5 g/dL

  

  

    
WHO: World Health Organization; NCI: National Cancer Institute 

  










Table 1: Grading the severity of CRA.

What are the Treatment Options Available for CRA? Review of Evidence

In the management of CRA, the available treatment options include: Red blood cell transfusion, ESA and iron therapy. For serious and life-threatening CRA, blood transfusion is the treatment of choice -Table 1. For less severe types of CIA (Hb. ‹10dL), the FDA approved erythropoiesis stimulatory agents (ESA) in 1993. Following worsened health outcomes associated with the use of ESA, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2007, made substantial revisions for use of ESA because of increased risk of tumor progression or reduced survival in patients with cancer [21,22]. The NCCN and FDA have restricted the indications for ESA with or without iron supplementation in CRA, for patients with cancer, only when cure is not the ultimate aim of treatment. While IV iron may be beneficial in CRA, it is not uniformly approved by most of the international clinical practice guidelines in Oncology [23].

When is Red Cell Transfusion Needed in CRA?

The transfusion guidelines of the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) do not make a specific recommendation for a transfusion threshold in patients with hematological or oncological

disorders [24]. Nevertheless, many physicians follow the AABB recommendations of restrictive hemoglobin transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL in hemodynamically stable hospitalized adult patients [24-26]. NCCN (Version 2.2018) outlines three general categories: 1) asymptomatic without significant comorbidities, for which observation and periodic re-evaluation are appropriate; 2) high risk (progressive decline in Hb. with recent intensive chemotherapy or radiation) or asymptomatic with comorbidities (cardiac disease, chronic pulmonary disease, cerebral vascular disease), for which transfusion can be considered; and 3) symptomatic, for which patients need transfusion. The need for RBC transfusion in CRA should be based on overall clinical context, comorbidities including underlying vascular disease, patient preferences, and alternative specific interventions, when making decisions regarding transfusion in individual patient [24]. There are no specific evidence based guidelines for patients with thrombocytopenia, chronic transfusiondependent anemia or patients with acute bleeding symptoms [24, 27-30]. Higher hemoglobin thresholds may be needed for patients with severe thrombocytopenia, who are at increased risk of bleeding, as experimental evidence suggests that anemia may aggravate thrombocytopenia induced bleeding [31].

How do we Dose ESA in CRA?

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have stringent guidelines for ESA use in metastatic cancer (cms.gov). The hemoglobin level immediately prior to initiation or maintenance of ESA treatment should be ‹10 g/dL (the hematocrit ‹30%). The starting dose for ESA treatment should be no more than 150 U/ kg/three times weekly for erythropoietin and 2.25 mcg/kg/weekly for darbepoetin alpha. When hemoglobin (Hb.) rises ‹1 g/dL (hematocrit rise ‹3%) compared to pretreatment baseline over 4 weeks of treatment and whose Hb. level remains ‹10 g/dL after the 4 weeks of treatment (or the hematocrit is ‹30%), the dose may be increased once by 25%. Continued use of the drug is not reasonable and necessary if the hemoglobin rises ‹1 g/dL (hematocrit rise ‹3%) compared to pretreatment baseline by 8 weeks of treatment. The ESA treatment duration for each course of chemotherapy includes the 8 weeks following the final dose of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. About 50% to 70% of patients treated with ESAs in clinical trials of CIA, responded to treatment as measured by increment in Hb [32- 36].

How do we Diagnose CRA in the Setting of Iron Deficiency?

Diagnosis of Iron deficiency is difficult in CRA, as iron deficiency may be absolute (true) or relative (functional). Absolute iron deficiency may develop from mucosal bleeding and during chronic ESA administration due to a progressive shift of iron stores to the erythron [37]. Functional iron deficiency occurs when the body iron stores are normal (or even increased), but iron supply to the erythroid marrow is inadequate in the initial phase of RBC regeneration, after the administration of ESA to subjects [38]. This is relevant in any condition causing anemia of chronic inflammation. Here, the serum iron and transferrin saturation are low, serum ferritin is normal, and iron procurement by transferrin is not adequate [39]. Absolute Iron deficiency is diagnosed when reticulocyte hemoglobin content is ‹28 pg (now incorporated with the anemia panel in most of the labs.) or

with an elevated soluble transferrin receptor assay (0.76-1.76 mg/L) [40,41].

Table 2: Trials of ESA with IV iron in CRA.





  

    
Study

    
No.

    
Treatment

    
Duration

    
Conclusion

  

  

    
Auerbach et al. [52]

    
157

    
ESA /ESA+Po Fe./ESA+IV Fe.

    
6 W

    
Response

  

  

    
Henry et al. [53]

    
129

    
ESA /ESA+Po Fe./ESA+IV Fe.

    
4W

    
Response

  

  

    
Hedenus et al. [46]

    
67

    
ESA /ESA+IV Fe.

    
15W

    
Response

  

  

    
Bastit et al. [45]

    
678

    
ESA+Po Fe./ESA+IV Fe.

    
10W

    
Response

  

  

    
Pedrazzoli et al. [47]

    
252

    
ESA/ESA+IV Fe.

    
12W

    
Response

  

  

    
Auerbach et al. [54]

    
402

    
ESA/ESA+IV Fe.

    
15W

    
Response

  

  

    
Steensma et al. [55]

    
814

    
ESA /ESA+Po Fe./ESA+IV Fe.

    
15W

    
No benefit

  

  

    
Steinmetz et al. [48]

    
286

    
ESA /ESA+Po Fe./ESA+IV Fe.

    
12W

    
Response

  

  

    
Macci� A et al. [56]

    
148

    
ESA+PO Fe./ESA+IV Fe.

    
12W

    
No benefit

  

  

    
ESA: Erythropoietin; PO Fe: oral iron; IV Fe: Intravenous    Iron

  










Table 2: Trials of ESA with IV iron in CRA.

Oral or Intravenous Iron in CRA? REVIEW of Evidence

Petrelli, et al. [42] in their meta-analysis of IV and oral iron in CRA, reported that oral iron failed to increase either the hematopoietic response or the transfusion rate. Another meta-analysis compared IV iron with oral iron with ESA in CRA, and found improved hematopoietic response and reduced need for RBC transfusions with IV iron [43]. The benefit of IV iron with ESA for patients with metastatic cancer with improvement in their hematological status, was again confirmed in a Cochrane Review [44]. The response to IV iron was attributed to the functional iron deficiency that occurs in the initial phase of erythropoietin therapy (secondary to increased red cell production depleting the iron stores), not able to keep pace even with several fold increased iron absorption from the gut by ESA [39]. However, the trials included in the meta-analysis had different end-points and criteria for patient selection. Moreover, the eligibility criteria varied, from baseline serum ferritin of ‹10 ng/mL to 900 ng/ mL, and iron saturation of ‹15% to 60%thus providing little, if any, information to be translated in the everyday clinical practice [45-47]. A recent meta-analysis showed no difference in quality of life with iron supplementation in CRA [44]. Not included in any of the metaanalysis are the three IV iron alone (without ESA) trials in CRA. They all had increment of Hb. (1.3 g/dL –1.8 g/dL), with at least one trial documenting a significant reduction in the transfusion rate (63.6 to 22.7 %) [48-51]. However, in the IV iron only trials, patients received IV iron regardless of their initial iron status [23].

What is the Ideal Dose and Type of IV iron in CRA

Intravenous iron is well tolerated, but the total dose of IV iron in the trials varied from 750 mg- 3000 mg and there was no maximum limit to the dose of IV iron [23]. In most of the trials, IV iron was given when the chemotherapy regimen exceeded eight weeks, but the duration of IV iron therapy in the trials is wide-ranging. The type of IV iron, dose and treatment regimen in the trials varied widely. This includes iron sucrose 100 mg IV weekly, iron sucrose 200 mg IV every 2-3 weekly, sodium ferrous gluconate 125 mg IV weekly, low molecular weight iron dextran 100 mg IV weekly and low molecular weight iron dextran as total dose IV infusion [57]. Mhaskar et al.

[44], in their Cochrane Review, reported that the type of IV iron (dextran versus gluconate versus sucrose) did not have an impact on hematopoietic response.

Clinical Practice Guidelines

NCCN (National Cancer Committee Network) guidelines (version 2.2018) has endorsed IV iron to be considered for CRA, with serum ferritin up to 1000 ng/mL or till iron saturation reaches 50%. The NCCN (NCCN version 2.2018) guidelines recommend that clinicians consider repeating iron studies if the MCV is ‹80 fL, or if evidence of hypochromic red blood cells is seen in the peripheral blood. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) has clearly stated that there is no role for oral iron with ESA in CRA, suggesting ESA with the addition of intravenous iron is needed for improved hematological response [58]. Other practice guidelines have not uniformly accepted IV iron in patients with CRA. The current ASCO/ASH guidelines have not endorsed IV iron, because of the insufficient evidence to consider IV iron as a standard of care in CRA [59]. According to the Canadian guidelines, the provision of parenteral iron in CRA with ESA is to be considered for patients with functional iron deficiency (serum ferritin >100 ng and iron saturation >15%) [57]. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) has advised IV iron, only for patients with absolute iron deficiency [60]. The role of IV iron in management of CRA, is still unsettled [59].

Monitoring Intervention in CRA

Monitoring intervention appears to be difficult because of vague symptoms, but quality-of-life outcome is a measurable target. Cancer-related fatigue is multifactorial, under-reported and undertreated [61-63]. NCCN Guidelines Version 2.2017 defines cancerrelated fatigue as a distressing, persistent, subjective sense of physical, emotional, and/or cognitive tiredness or exhaustion related to cancer or cancer treatment, which is not proportional to recent activity. The tools to assess quality-of-life outcome and to monitor response to therapy include: Brief Fatigue Inventory [64], EORTC QLQ -C30 questionnaire [65], Fatigue questionnaire [66], Visual Analogue Fatigue Scale [67], Fatigue Symptom Inventory [68] and NCCN Problem List.

Management

There are no standard guidelines for management of chemotherapy related anemia. Treatment of chemotherapy related anemia is based on clinical state of the patient (adjuvant or metastatic setting), rapidity of the needed response (based on vitals and comorbidities) and adherence to CMS guidelines in use of erythropoietin, iron supplementation (either by mouth or IV route) and judicious use of PRBCs.

In the comprehensive data collected from the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) and Medicare-linked database, the combination of ESA and other agents including trastuzumab showed no negative impact on longterm survival of metastatic cancer patients [72]. The detrimental effect of ESA in patients with metastatic breast cancer was seen when Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines were not strictly adhered to [73].

Conclusion and Future Directions

Management of CRA is challenging, as there are no internationally accepted guidelines for management of CRA. However, we have made rapid strides in understanding the pathophysiology of CRA. The primary aims of treatment in CRA are to avoid blood transfusion and to improve anemia related symptoms .With the restrictions in ESA, IV iron on its own, may be an alternative. The expected overall survival of all cancers is on the upward trend according to a report released by FDA in 2017. Moving forward, we need a risk adopted strategy for management of CRA. In the absence of “Consensus Statement”, accumulating evidence suggests that treatment of CRA should be based on clinical severity, stage of the disease, application of reticulocyte hemoglobin in the diagnostic panel and utilization of validated predictive biomarker hepcidin in CRA. Herein, we have attempted to provide a rational approach to the management of CRA, acknowledging that there are no evidence based algorithm available for this clinical entity.

References

  1. Knight K, Wade S, Balducci L. Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Med. 2004; 116: 11s-26s.
  2. Knight K, Wade S, Balducci L. Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Med. 2004; 116: 11s-26s.
  3. Birgegard G, Henry D, Glaspy J, Chopra R, Thomsen LL, Auerbach M. A Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside versus Oral Iron Sulfate in Patients with Nonmyeloid Malignancies and Anemia Receiving Chemotherapy: The PROFOUND Trial. Pharmacotherapy. 2016; 36: 402- 414.
  4. Girelli D, Nemeth E, Swinkels DW. Hepcidin in the diagnosis of iron disorders. Blood. 2016; 127: 2809-2813.
  5. Moretti D, Goede JS, Zeder C, Jiskra M, Chatzinakou V, Tjalsma H, et al. Oral iron supplements increase hepcidin and decrease iron absorption from daily or twice-daily doses in iron-depleted young women. Blood. 2015: 126: 1981-1989
  6. Stoffel NU, Cercamondi CI, Brittenham G, et al. Iron absorption from oral iron supplements given on consecutive versus alternate days and as single morning doses versus twice-daily split dosing in iron-depleted women: two open-label, randomised controlled trials. The Lancet Haematology. 2017; 4: e524-e533.
  7. Ganz T. Hepcidin, a key regulator of iron metabolism and mediator of anemia of inflammation. Blood. 2003; 102: 783-788.
  8. Kali A, Charles MV, Seetharam RS. Hepcidin - A novel biomarker with changing trends. Pharmacogn Rev. 2015; 9: 35-40.
  9. Weiss G, Goodnough LT. Anemia of chronic disease. N Eng J Med. 2005; 352: 1011-1023.
  10. Orlandi R, De Bortoli M, Ciniselli CM, et al. Hepcidin and ferritin blood level as noninvasive tools for predicting breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25: 352-357.
  11. Tanno T, Rabel A, Alleyne M, et al. Hepcidin, anaemia, and prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2011; 107: 678-679.
  12. Abd Elmonem E, Tharwa el S, Farag MA, Fawzy A, El Shinnawy SF, Suliman S. Hepcidin mRNA level as a parameter of disease progression in chronic hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Egypt Nat Canc Inst. 2009; 21: 333-342.
  13. Wu XN, Su D, Wang L, Yu FL. Roles of the hepcidin-ferroportin axis and iron in cancer. Eur J Cancer prev. 2014; 23: 122-133.
  14. Maes K, Nemeth E, Roodman GD, Huston A, Esteve F, Freytes C, et al. In anemia of multiple myeloma, hepcidin is induced by increased bone morphogenetic protein 2. Blood. 2010; 116: 3635-3644.
  15. Nicolae CD, Coman OA, Ene C, Nicolae I, Fulga I. Hepcidin in neoplastic disease. J Med Life. 2013; 6: 355-360.
  16. Consensus conference. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion. JAMA. 1988; 260: 2700-2703.
  17. Groopman JE, Itri LM. Chemotherapy-induced anemia in adults: incidence and treatment. J Nati Canc Inst. 1999; 91: 1616-1634.
  18. Irvine D, Vincent L, Graydon JE, Bubela N, Thompson L. The prevalence and correlates of fatigue in patients receiving treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A comparison with the fatigue experienced by healthy individuals. Cancer Nurs. 1994; 17: 367-378.
  19. Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997; 13: 63-74.
  20. Cella D. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Scale: a new tool for the assessment of outcomes in cancer anemia and fatigue. Semin hematol. 1997; 34: 13-19.
  21. Visweshwar N, Jaglal M, Sokol L, Zuckerman K. Chemotherapy-related anemia. Annals of hematology. 2017.
  22. Glaspy J. Update on safety of ESAs in cancer-induced anemia. J Nati Compr Canc Netw. 2012; 10: 659-666
  23. Rodgers GM 3rd, Becker PS, Blinder M, Cella D, Chanan-Khan A, Cleeland C, et al. Cancer- and chemotherapy-induced anemia. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012; 10: 628-653.
  24. Aapro M, Osterborg A, Gascon P, Ludwig H, Beguin Y. Prevalence and management of cancer-related anaemia, iron deficiency and the specific role of i.v. iron. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23: 1954-1962.
  25. Carson JL, Guyatt G, Heddle NM, Grossman BJ, Cohn CS, Fung MK, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines From the AABB: Red Blood Cell Transfusion Thresholds and Storage. JAMA. 2016; 316: 2025-2035.
  26. Ferraris VA, Brown JR, Despotis GJ, Hammon JW, Reece TB, Saha SP, et al. 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 91: 944-982.
  27. Retter A, Wyncoll D, Pearse R, et al. Guidelines on the management of anaemia and red cell transfusion in adult critically ill patients. Br J Haematol. 2013; 160: 445-464.
  28. Valles J, Santos MT, Aznar J, Marcus AJ, Martinez-Sales V, Portoles M, et al. Erythrocytes metabolically enhance collagen-induced platelet responsiveness via increased thromboxane production, adenosine diphosphate release, and recruitment. Blood. 1991; 78: 154-162.
  29. Escolar G, Garrido M, Mazzara R, Castillo R, Ordinas A. Experimental basis for the use of red cell transfusion in the management of anemicthrombocytopenic patients. Transfusion. 1988; 28: 406-411.
  30. Webert KE, Cook RJ, Couban S, et al. A multicenter pilot-randomized controlled trial of the feasibility of an augmented red blood cell transfusion strategy for patients treated with induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia or stem cell transplantation. Transfusion. 2008; 48: 81-91.
  31. DeZern AE, Williams K, Zahurak M, et al. Red blood cell transfusion triggers in acute leukemia: a randomized pilot study. Transfusion. 2016; 56: 1750- 1757.
  32. Valeri CR, Cassidy G, Pivacek LE, Hand W, Stephens RS, King KE , et al. Anemia-induced increase in the bleeding time: implications for treatment of nonsurgical blood loss. Transfusion. 2001; 41: 977-983.
  33. Chang J, Couture F, Young S, McWatters KL, Lau CY. Weekly epoetin alfa maintains hemoglobin, improves quality of life, and reduces transfusion in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 2597- 2605
  34. Vansteenkiste J, Pirker R, Massuti B, Barata F, Font A, Fiegl M, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial of darbepoetin alfa in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002; 94: 1211-1220.
  35. Osterborg A, Brandberg Y, Molostova V, Iosava G, Abdulkadyrov K, Hedenus M, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant human erythropoietin, epoetin Beta, in hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20: 2486-2494.
  36. Canon JL, Vansteenkiste J, Bodoky G, Mateos MV, Bastit L, Ferreira I, et al. Randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial of every-3-week darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006; 98: 273-284.
  37. Cazzola M, Beguin Y, Kloczko J, Spicka I, Coiffier B. Once-weekly epoetin beta is highly effective in treating anaemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancy and defective endogenous erythropoietin production. Br J Haematol. 2003; 122: 386-393.
  38. Finch CA, Huebers H. Perspectives in iron metabolism. N Engl J Med. 1982; 306: 1520-1528.
  39. Skikne BS, Cook JD. Effect of enhanced erythropoiesis on iron absorption. J Lab Clin Med. 1992; 120: 746-751
  40. Brugnara C. Reticulocyte cellular indices: a new approach in the diagnosis of anemias and monitoring of erythropoietic function. Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences. 2000; 37: 93-130.
  41. Beguin Y. Soluble transferrin receptor for the evaluation of erythropoiesis and iron status. Clin Chim Acta. 2003; 329: 9-22.
  42. Petrelli F, Borgonovo K, Cabiddu M, Lonati V, Barni S. Addition of iron to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012; 138: 179-187.
  43. Gafter-Gvili A, Rozen-Zvi B, Vidal L, Leibovici L, Vansteenkiste J, Gafter U, et al. Intravenous iron supplementation for the treatment of chemotherapyinduced anaemia - systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Acta oncologica. 2013; 52: 18-29.
  44. Mhaskar R, Wao H, Miladinovic B, Kumar A, Djulbegovic B. The role of iron in the management of chemotherapy-induced anemia in cancer patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 2: Cd009624.
  45. Bastit L, Vandebroek A, Altintas S, Gaede B, Pintér T, Suto TS, et al. Randomized, multicenter, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alpha administered every 3 weeks with or without intravenous iron in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 1611-1618
  46. Hedenus M, Birgegard G, Nasman P, Ahlberg L, Karlsson T, Lauri B, et al. Addition of intravenous iron to epoetin beta increases hemoglobin response and decreases epoetin dose requirement in anemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies: a randomized multicenter study. Leukemia. 2007; 21: 627-632.
  47. Pedrazzoli P, Farris A, Del Prete S, Del Gaizo F, Ferrari D, Bianchessi C, et al. Randomized trial of intravenous iron supplementation in patients with chemotherapy-related anemia without iron deficiency treated with darbepoetin alpha. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 1619-1625.
  48. Steinmetz T, Tschechne B, Harlin O, et al. Clinical experience with ferric carboxymaltose in the treatment of cancer- and chemotherapy-associated anaemia. Anna Oncol. 2013; 24: 475-482.
  49. Dangsuwan P, Manchana T. Blood transfusion reduction with intravenous iron in gynecologic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 116: 522-525.
  50. Kim YT, Kim SW, Yoon BS, Cho HJ, Nahm EJ, Kim SH, et al. Effect of intravenously administered iron sucrose on the prevention of anemia in the cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Gynecol oncol. 2007; 105: 199-204.
  51. Gemici C, Yetmen O, Yaprak G, Ozden S, Tepetam H, Ozyurt H, et al. Is there any role of intravenous iron for the treatment of anemia in cancer? BMC cancer. 2016; 16: 661.
  52. 52. Auerbach M, Ballard H, Trout JR, McIlwain M, Ackerman A, Bahrain H, et al. Intravenous iron optimizes the response to recombinant human erythropoietin in cancer patients with chemotherapy-related anemia: a multicenter, openlabel, randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 1301-1307.
  53. Henry DH, Dahl NV, Auerbach M, Tchekmedyian S, Laufman LR. Intravenous ferric gluconate significantly improves response to epoetin alfa versus oral iron or no iron in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Oncologist. 2007; 12: 231-242.
  54. Auerbach M, Silberstein PT, Webb RT, Averyanova S, Ciuleanu TE, Shao J, et al. Darbepoetin alfa 300 or 500 mug once every 3 weeks with or without intravenous iron in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. Am J Hematol. 2010; 85: 655-663.
  55. Steensma DP, Sloan JA, Dakhil SR, Dalton R, Kahanic SP, Prager DJ, et al. Phase III, randomized study of the effects of parenteral iron, oral iron, or no iron supplementation on the erythropoietic response to darbepoetin alfa for patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 97-105.
  56. Maccio A, Madeddu C, Gramignano G, Mulas C, Sanna E, Mantovani G. Efficacy and safety of oral lactoferrin supplementation in combination with rHuEPO-beta for the treatment of anemia in advanced cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: open-label, randomized controlled study. Oncologist. 2010; 15: 894-902.
  57. Mikhael J, Melosky B, Cripps C, Rayson D, Kouroukis CT. Canadian supportive care recommendations for the management of anemia in patients with cancer. Curr Oncol. 2007; 14: 209-217.
  58. Bokemeyer C, Aapro MS, Courdi A, Foubert J, Link H, Osterborg A, et al. EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer: 2006 update. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2007; 43: 258-270.
  59. Gafter-Gvili A, Steensma DP, Auerbach M. Should the ASCO/ASH Guidelines for the use of intravenous iron in cancer- and chemotherapy-induced anemia be updated? J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2014; 12: 657-664.
  60. Schrijvers D, De Samblanx H, Roila F. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of anaemia in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for use. Ann Oncol. 2010; 21 Suppl 5: v244-247.
  61. Behringer K, Goergen H, Muller H, Thielen I, Brillant C, Kreissl S, et al. Cancer- Related Fatigue in Patients With and Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Impact on Treatment Outcome and Social Reintegration. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 4329-4337.
  62. Janda M, Gerstner N, Obermair A, Fuerst A, Wachter S, Dieckmann K, et al. Quality of life changes during conformal radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2000; 89: 1322-1328.
  63. Crom DB, Hinds PS, Gattuso JS, Tyc V, Hudson MM. Creating the basis for a breast health program for female survivors of Hodgkin disease using a participatory research approach. Oncology nursing forum. 2005; 32: 1131- 1141.
  64. Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Cleeland CS, Morrissey M, Johnson BA, Wendt JK, et al. The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer. 1999; 85: 1186-1196.
  65. Matsuo N, Morita T, Iwase S. Efficacy and undesirable effects of corticosteroid therapy experienced by palliative care specialists in Japan: a nationwide survey. J Palliat Med. 2011; 14: 840-845.
  66. Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, et al. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res. 1993; 37: 147-153.
  67. Glaus A. Assessment of fatigue in cancer and non-cancer patients and in healthy individuals. Support Care Cancer. 1993; 1: 305-315.
  68. Hann DM, Jacobsen PB, Azzarello LM, Martin SC, Curran SL, et al. Measurement of fatigue in cancer patients: development and validation of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory. Qual Life Res. 1998; 7: 301-310.
  69. Bohlius J, Tonia T, Nuesch E, Jüni P, Fey MF, Egger M, et al. Effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on fatigue- and anaemia-related symptoms in cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analyses of published and unpublished data. Br J Cancer. 2014; 111: 33-45.
  70. Carson JL, Grossman BJ, Kleinman S, Tinmouth AT, Marques MB, Fung MK, et al. Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB. Annals of internal medicine. 2012; 157: 49-58.
  71. Carson JL, Terrin ML, Noveck H, Sanders DW, Chaitman BR, Rhoads GG, et al. Liberal or restrictive transfusion in high-risk patients after hip surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 2453-2462.
  72. Lai Y, Ye Z, Civan JM, Wang C, Cristofanilli M, Mu Z, et al. The effects of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on the short-term and long-term survivals in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a SEER population-based study. Breast cancer research and treatment. 2015; 153: 407-416.
  73. Arbuckle RB, Griffith NL, Iacovelli LM, Johnson PE, Jorgenson JA, Kloth DD, et al. Continued challenges with the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with cancer: perspectives and issues on policy-guided health care. Pharmacotherapy. 2008; 28: 1s-15s.

Citation: Visweshwar N, Jaglal M and Sokol L. Challenges in the Management of Chemotherapy Related Anemia. Ann Hematol Oncol. 2018; 5(3): 1200.