Challenges in a Version of Major Maternal Morbidities and Mortality in Low Resource Rural Women, Community Based Analysis Running Head, Averting Major Maternal Morbidities, Mortality at Community by Nurse Midwives

Research Article

Austin Crit Care Case Rep. 2019; 3(1): 1013.

Challenges in a Version of Major Maternal Morbidities and Mortality in Low Resource Rural Women, Community Based Analysis Running Head, Averting Major Maternal Morbidities, Mortality at Community by Nurse Midwives

Chhabra S1* and Jaju UN2

¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, India

²Professor of Medicine, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, India

*Corresponding author: Chhabra S, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emeritus Professor, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, Wardha, Maharashtra, India

Received: April 12, 2019; Accepted: September 23, 2019; Published: September 30, 2019

Abstract

Preventable maternal deaths continue to occur in resource poor countries due to pre-existing poor health, lack of access to safe abortion, safe birth, quality prenatal, and intra-natal, postnatal care. But even with low resources deaths can be prevented by providing community based services with linkage to health facilities equipped for appropriate, effective interventions, quality maternity care.

Were to know persisting challenges share information about rural community based maternal care by nurse midwives in region with low resources. Analysis of records of community based services provided by supervised NM to prevent maternal deaths, severe morbidities was done. Each pregnancy was followed, irrespective of place, type, and outcome. There was change in place of births, more hospital births. Home births eliminated in villages where services were initiated in 1986. In same villages in 2018 there were no home births, 67.84% at referral institute, 32.16% other hospitals. In other villages, 47.36% births took place at home, 44.73% other hospitals, 7.98 at referral institute in 1995. In 2018 1.61% home births, 9.67% at referral hospital 88.70% other hospitals. NM can do a lot in supervised channel for maternal care to rural women with low resources. But quality care at referral is essential.

Keywords: Maternal Morbidities, Mortality

Background

Globally many maternal deaths continue to occur in low resource settings due to complications during pregnancy, delivery, and puerperium. While a lot of research still goes on about many disorders during pregnancy, obvious causes seem to be pre-existing poor health, lack of access to safe abortions and lack of quality prenatal, intra-natal and postnatal care. Almost each of the maternal death is preventable by community based maternal care to those who can not reach health facilities and linking of these women to health facilities which are ready for effective interventions as per the need and as and when needed. It is essential to have supervised channelized system between the communities and the referral health facilities. The international, national organizational capacity and resources do exist for the system. What is needed is the understanding of precisely where to concentrate efforts. Maternal health scenario can be changed with timely identification of disorders, timely decision to transfer the women to referral and refer too and finally providing right treatment at referral. These are the key factors in the reduction of maternal and neonatal morbidities and mortality. An estimated 300,000 women died as a result of pregnancy-related conditions in the world in 2015 [1]. From 1990 to 2015, global maternal deaths decreased by 29 percent and Maternal Mortality Rate decreased by 30 percent based on estimates compiled from data sources from 186 of 195 countries [2]. In 2015, the MMR (maternal deaths per 100.000 live births) for the world was 216, which reflected a 2.3 percent annual decline [3]. In 2015, regional MMRs ranged between 12 for highincome regions to 546 for sub-Saharan Africa. Even for Universal Health Coverage (UHC) maternal health care is a critical component because it directly affects women’s lives, their babies, their families, communities and nations at large. As such indicators of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health also include antenatal and intranatal care [4].

Objectives

The objectives were to analyse records of community based services provided by NM to rural women of low resource communities to know the efficacy, challenges and share results.

Materials and Methods

The analysis of records of community based maternal services by NM, retrained for the job expected, was done. They were advised to provide antenatal care and ensure linkage to health facilities, track outcome of services whatever. Women used private or public health system or study institute. NM stationed at the institute where study was planned and executed, provided services to rural pregnant women with low resources. NMs visited the villages early in the morning Basic prenatal care was provided with advocacy for referral to those who needed specialised care. For intranatal and postnatal needs advocacy was done. Usually women from three villages were provided care in one visit by 3 NMs, each one covering one village. They were supervised by the health personnel of the referral institute where analysis of records was done and where most of the women with emergency problems sought services. High risk cases were identified and risk prediction was also done at community level by NM. However pregnant women, families and local health workers, volunteers were made aware of possibilities of emergencies during pregnancy, labour and postpartum even in low risk cases and importance of timely transfer to appropriate places for essential services. NM visited each village 5 times in a year because of resource crunch, trying to make it a cost effective venture. So many women were available during pregnancy for maternal care only 3times, some only twice. Volunteers, health workers from the villages not only helped the NM in getting the information about possible new pregnancies and births in each village but provided support also. Each pregnancy was followed, irrespective of the place, type of delivery and outcome. A supervising system was made. The residents under the guidance of the author at the referral institute, (study site), monitored the information of each visit of NM with a checklist for the outcome of each visit to villages. Families of nearby villages were covered under special assurance schemes of the institution [5].They knew that essential emergency obstetric care was available, either free or at subsidized rates at the institution. Other villages which were little away and where services were initiated later were not directly covered by the schemes of the institute. But these communities were also aware of schemes which could be used to get subsidized services. It was also ensured that villagers either had their own system or were aware of public health system for timely transfer a linkage to appropriate health facilities. Economical delivery kits made in obstetrics and gynaecology of the institute were provided to the families in case of home birth in emergency, like preterm labour or because of the difficulties of transferor for those who wanted home births if everything was normal because the mission was to go with communities with awakened families. Although the women and the families were advised health facility delivery, some still delivered at home. As per the need women were also helped to get economical short stay waiting home within 2 minutes walk from maternity wards of the institute. Base data was collected in 1986 and maternal services were initiated in 1987 in the group of 25 villages within 25-35 kms, which were covered under the rural health assurance scheme of the institute. In other group of 28 villages, 80-90 kms away from the institute, not covered under assurance schemes, base information was collected in 1994 and services were initiated in 1995.The population of the 25 villages was around 27700 and of 28 villages 22500, as some villages were small, others little bigger and each village had only 3-7 deliveries in a year.

Results

There has been change in places of births, with more of health facilities births. Home births have almost been eliminated in villages where services were initiated in 1986. In 1987 there were 36.23% home births, 14.49% at referral institute (where study was done) and 49.27% at other health facilities. In the same set of villages in 2018 there were no home births, 67.83% at referral institute and 32.16% at other hospitals. In villages, little away from study institute where services were initiated later, 47.36% births took place at home, 44.74% at other health facilities 7.98 referral study institute in 1995. In 2018there were 1.61% home births, 9.67% at referral hospital and 88.70% at other health facilities.

At the community level maternal deaths were 1620/one lac live births between1986-88, base data. It was not really Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) as it included all deaths during pregnancy, births and post birth, irrespective of the cause. It was difficult to know the causes of maternal deaths in base data. As services were initiated maternal deaths occurred one each due to Preterm birth with postpartum Tubercular Meningitis, Cerebral Malaria, Poisoning, Suicidal Burns, and Sub Acute Intestinal Obstruction with Aspiration making 1290 maternal deaths / laclive births between 1989-1991. Later there was one death due to cerebral malaria in 1995 and one suicide during pregnancy in 1998.There was no other death during pregnancy, labour or post partum in the 25 villages (Table 1).

Citation:Chhabra S and Jaju UN. Challenges in a Version of Major Maternal Morbidities and Mortality in Low Resource Rural Women, Community Based Analysis Running Head, Averting Major Maternal Morbidities, Mortality at Community by Nurse Midwives. Austin Crit Care Case Rep. 2019; 3(1): 1013.